Randy MacDonald wrote: > Doesn't sound to me like there's much meat in those kind > of functions.
Sure, and I think I used the word "trivially" when I started talking about this subtopic (rather than "meaty"). My point was that allowing something to be classified as a function by introducing sufficient arguments to turn it into a function is a trivial (non-meaty, even -- nice turn of phrase) approach. > I'll admit it has some use. It does. Then again, it's not what people would normally think is meant, in discussions about what is a function, and what is not, unless this aspect of introducing extra parameters was fully specified. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
