> 2 : 'x ; y' is the same as 2 : 'u ; v' (this is for compatibility > with antediluvian versions of J).
There were no pre-diluvian nor diluvian versions of J. Both eras were pre-Babel and there was only one universal language. ----- Original Message ----- From: Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, October 2, 2006 10:17 am Subject: RE: [Jgeneral] conjunction definition problem- bug. > I don't understand the problem. > > 2 : 'x ; y' is the same as 2 : 'u ; v' (this is for compatibility > with antediluvian versions of J). > > 2 : 'if. n do. x u y end.' is a mistake because it defines the > monadic valence. You meant > > 2 : 0 > : > if. n do. x u y end. > ) > > u/v always give you the left/right arguments to the > conjunction itself. x/y give you the noun arguments to the > derived verb PROVIDED the conjunction contains the word > u/v/m/n somewhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
