Thanks for the feedback re the J dictionary. I have removed mention of conjunctions wrt trains.
I have removed the sentence in section II G that contains the word "operator". I will think of a place to put the description that operator denotes adverb or conjunction. I have removed mention of trident. "Bident" continues to be used just once, as the label on row 6 of the parse table. (Row 5 is now labelled "Fork".) I have made no changes regarding "pro-adverb" and "pro-conjunction", nor regarding "pronoun" and "proverb". I prefer not to have a separate definitional section. Such a section increases the chances of having two different definitions for the same term. As well, many of these terms are best defined together in running prose. (For example, cell, frame, and item.) The index is constructed by a program. The program can be improved. For example, I would like the program to accept a list of terms that should be indexed in addition to any terms that it comes up with. It is mystifying to me how the program can omit from the index words like "adverb" and "cell" and "quicksort". A convenient way to search keywords in a document is to catenate all the HTML files together as one, and then use the browser (esp. FireFox) to do the searching. ----- Original Message ----- From: Boyko Bantchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, October 1, 2006 11:51 am Subject: [Jgeneral] word-chasing in the docs > I spent some time of the weekend chasing the > definitions of certain terms in the documentation > that comes with the J distribution. Here are some > observations from my reading that I would like to > share. ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
