Au contraire.

Richard Donovan wrote:
I nominate this reply, and a previous one-liner by the same author
( " This is not a bug " ) as two of the most uninformative and unhelpful
messages I have ever seen posted to this normally informative and
very helpful forum!



From: Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: General forum <[email protected]>
To: General forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Bug?  Sin of pi.
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:06:26 -0800

Changes in the C library?  Vagaries in the CPU?
Phase of the moon?



----- Original Message -----
From: Joey K Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 1, 2006 10:55 am
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Bug?  Sin of pi.

> At 10:32  -0800 2006/12/01, Roger Hui wrote:
> >Because
> >
> >    1p1 - 3.141592653589793
> >0
> >
> But, as was pointed out -
>
>    9!:14 ''
> 4.05/2001-05-16/11:30
>    1 o. 1p1
> 0
>    1p1 - 3.141592653589793
> 0
>
> I think the question is, what has caused the shift?
>
>    9!:14 ''
> j504/2005-03-16/15:30
>    1 o. 1p1
> 1.22461e_16
>    1p1 - 3.141592653589793
> 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

_________________________________________________________________
It's Hotmail's 10th Birthday! Come and play Pass the Parcel http://www.msnpasstheparcel.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to