Yeah, I saw this. It's been 8 years since then. Why shouldn't a team
assemble this year?

On 4/3/07, bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terrence Brannon wrote:
> Is anyone here contemplating entering this? I would like to see a J entry
> this year:

FYI http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/pousse.htm

<quote>
The J team won the Judge's Prize in the ICFP'98 Functional Programming Contest.
Here are the judges' comments on the J program:

The contest judges selected the J program because we felt it was the most
thought-provoking entry. In brief, it is everything the number one Cilk Pousse
entry is not:

     *

       It is not parallel.
     *

       It is not even compiled -- it ran on a simple interpreter.
       Note that J's aggregate-data operators tend to keep execution in the
"leaf" primitives of the program, so this is rather more efficient than one
might imagine.

     *

       It is astoundingly brief.
       Not including comments and test-case "dead code," the J entry is 113
lines of code.
     *

       It is extremely functional.
       There is only one one loop in the whole program. J syntax allows
operators such as addition to be transparently "lifted" to function domains.

And yet the J entry proceeded to beat 17 compiled C entries, which we view as at
least a partial testament to the productivity gains of working with a powerful
notation (and a partial testament to the skill and expertise of the isi team
members, of course).

We felt there were several lessons in the J entry for the programming community.
Like the other two prize-winners, it is a strong statement.

Congratulations to the isi team! Without a doubt, "a bunch of extremely cool
hackers" -- and an extremely cool programming language.

<endquote>

--
regards,
bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to