Nothing dyadic here, in +/ i. 3  .

The verb Terrence was analyzing was +/, not +, so
the fact that + has rank 0 is immaterial.  (I suspect
that Terrence got a little confused about this, as
we all did when we were learning).  I should have
pointed out explicitly that the rank of +/ is infinite
(I've fixed that).

Henry Rich
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Harms
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:29 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Jgeneral] re: "JforC" - Controlling Verb Execution 
> By Specifying aRank ...
> 
> Randy A MacDonald wrote:
> 
> > Hi Henry;
> >
> > You are correct in that the rank of +/ is infinite, 
> > but I think Terrence was referring to +, which
> > _does_ have rank 0.
> >
> 
> What Terrence wrote was:
> 
> > The verb rank is 0 and the noun rank is 1,
> > therefore, r is 1 and so we will be applying
> > the verb to 1-cells.
> 
> The context (in JforC) of Terrence's attempt includes
> the following guidance:  
> 
> "Figure out the rank r of the cells that will be
> operated on; this will be the smaller of rank of the
> verb and the rank of the operand."
> 
> True, this guidance was given for monadic verbs, and
> the reader is in the as-yet-uncharted territory of
> dyadic verbage; perhaps things will be different here.
>  The assumption of consistency, however, is contrary
> to the "therefore" in Terrance's sentence. 
> Identifying the rank of +/ as infinite, in contrast,
> is consistent with the claim that rank-one cells apply
> here.
> 
> 
> Tracy
> 
> 
>  
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
> with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see 
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to