Raul Miller replied to my comment on order pairs:

On 4/6/07, Tracy Harms <t_b_harms at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I consider the basic data structure to be the 
>> ordered pair.  With less than ordered pairs, I
>> don't see what would count as structuring.  With
>> ordered pairs, it seems to me that any data 
>> structure can be created.
>
> I used to think that way, but I've since decided
> that ordered pairs are a special case of sequences.

I pointed to ordered pairs because Terrence seemed to
be thinking about the basic underpinnings of data
structuring, so it seemed to me worth pointing to the
minimal case.  The minimal case, with regard to
sequencing, seemed to be two.

You're getting me to reconsider that.  It may be more
minimal to put this in terms of concepts that are
independent of magnitude.  This approach fits with my
thoughts on the recent topic of rank, which are:

Arrays are defined by two qualities, substance and
position.  (Different terms may be used, such as
presence and orientation.)  The two edge cases are
atoms, which instantiate substance without position,
and null, which instantiates position without
substance.

Sequence is a plain term for the linear (minimal)
positioning of items.  The austerity of alignment
(i.e. being-in-a-line) seems much more fundamental
than the way two is the minimum count of items for a
line (list, or vector) to "exist."  What is important
is not the tally of items listed, it is that the axis
of measurement is a result of directional assessment.

The discovery of zero involved extending the concept
of magnitude to the absence of whatever thing might be
counted.  Sequence can be similarly extended, so that
we need not think only of sequences that involve item
counts of two and beyond.  We can also think of
rank-one nouns with one atom, and rank-one nouns that
are entirely empty.

   #$,0
1
   #$''
1
   
An axis, then, is an abstract distinct direction in
which things are counted.  Having identified an axis,
it is incidental how many items fall along it.  From
this it is right to say, as you indeed did say, that
"ordered pairs are a special case of sequences."


Tracy Harms


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to