Raul wrote: > u=:>:`<: > y=:0
We have a winner! This is the case I had it mind. I'm surprised it was suggested so quickly. >though violates your implicit requirement I had no such implicit requirement. > which would be that u is a verb -- I would expect m > as the placeholder if you were expecting a gerund I was using u in the sense that modifiers use u -- a reference to the LHA of the modifier. As in: 1 : 'u^:_1 (y)' vs 1 : u^:_1: (y)' That was part of the tricky question. > Also, I am not aware of and official documentation > discussing the use of a gerund as the left argument > for ^: The documentation is "official" but doesn't discuss the __use__ of a gerund LHA. Citation: http://www.jsoftware.com/help/release/status.htm#3.02 How did you know or learn about g^:n ? -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
