As I understand, unavailability of JDoR in Unix is
because of the result string ownership. Whereas in
Windows it's ownership is passed on to caller and
together with J they can access the shared SysAlloc's
API, the malloc/free are different; so either a free'er must
me provided or ownership is retained by J by means of
output callback, as it is done now. Is that correct reasoning?


--- Eric Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> JSM and Jga are just undocumented. And as such have been subject to some 
> changes over release versions. I intend to have JSM as a stable, documented, 
> and exampled part of the 602 release. JSM makes writing JFE much easier 
> (witness the complications in Mike's new Mac JFE). My feeling is that Jga is 
> much less important and there are easy workarounds so it may not make it 
> into the open this time round. The main thing that JSM lets you do is to set 
> the JE callback for formatted output.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Oleg Kobchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "General forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 7:27 PM
> Subject: [Jgeneral] JSM and Jga
> 
> 
> > So is the interface to JSM and Jga proprietory (closed)
> > or just undocumented?
> >
> > For example, in Unix, there is no JDoR, and it
> > resulted in a partial workaround of representing
> > output in a recent Mac client example, which was
> > pointed out to be unsatisfactory.
> >
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2006-November/028220.html
> >
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/beta/2006-February/000521.html
> >
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2003-August/014953.html
> >  BTW, the brinker server is still running unattended circa 2003.



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to