On 4/17/07, Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The wording as I have it in the book does not quite work as a programming spec. You calculate rcf as 0 (correct), but the (-rcf)-cells are intended to be the cells whose frame is empty, i. e. the operands in their entirety, NOT 0-cells. My wording says (-0)-cells which is worng - it shouldn't turn into 0-cells. I'll change the wording.
actually, I think you did it right... I just did not see the "-" in front of rcf... as long as the section of the book "negative verb rank" covers -0 cells, then I should have been able to cope. Maybe the J way of _rcf would have helped me see it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
