On 4/23/07, Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then you endorse Roger's definition of "have" . Our discussion is moot.
I do not dispute any mootness. That said, for definitions of "have", I am reasonably happy with http://www.answers.com/have -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
