On 4/24/07, John Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this merely delays the problem. You get the same issue with
streamlines with
plot Fz z r=: _1e_12+0.01*1+i.200
I agree that the axis labels are less than informative. The point is that
the transformation is (mathematically) conformal but evidently not
(computationally) conformal.
Well... even if we entirely toss the vertical axis rays, we still get
zero crossings for that range of radii:
plot Fz (z=:|:@:((i:4) ray"0) ) r=:0.01*1+i.200
Anyways, I guess this means I put my epsilon in the wrong place.
(I attribute that to my lack of familiarity with this problem domain).
But how about:
gz=:*: + ] * 1e_99 + %:@(1 + *:)
This eliminates the quirks that I think we are calling the problem.
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
