> PS: A note on nomenclature: Formally, only verbs can be > qualified with "monadic" or "dyadic". So there is no "dyadic ~".
In that case, it is more common and comprehensible to select the noun "dyad", as in "dyad~" or to rephrase, as in "f~ for dyad(ic) f ". Hmm; when one could choose to say "dyadic f" over "the dyad f"? When f is ambivalent and one wants to focus on the dyadic valence, as opposed to when f's monadic domain is either empty or totally irrelevant? -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
