Yes, I mean exactly this. Great, clever verb. I
think I understand your approach and it is very clever.
Thank you for sticking with me. I guess I still don't know
how to formulate the puzzle question cogently especially
without relying on the J definition of <;._3 .
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Raul Miller wrote:
+ On 5/5/07, Brian Schott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ > satisfy the requirements, but I guess there was another
+ > requirement that I did not make clear, namely that the
+ > intervals must be constructible with <;._3 and yours don't.
+
+ You mean like this?
+
+ parts=:[: (({~ (0 1 2 I.~ 3 * i. % ])@[EMAIL PROTECTED]:) , {:) [ <;._3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ 5 parts 11
+ +---------+---------+---------+----------+
+ |0 1 2 3 4|2 3 4 5 6|4 5 6 7 8|6 7 8 9 10|
+ +---------+---------+---------+----------+
+
+ --
+ Raul
+ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
+
(B=)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
