m&v and u&n (u v verbs, m n nouns) are quite different from u&v . ,&< is a case of the latter.
----- Original Message ----- From: Roelof Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2007 9:26 Subject: RE: [Jgeneral] normalize data To: 'General forum' <[email protected]> > The way I read > ,&< > Is that , is bonded with < . This does not make sense > however since it > would mean that dyad < is turned into a monad and , does not > make sense as a > left argument for < ( less than). > What is wrong in my thinking > cheers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
