Raul observed: > ?.]3#100 > 46 55 79 > ?."0]3#100 > 46 46 46
Roger, what is the rationale for not changing the advertised rank of ?. in the dictionary (and b. )? Why not just give the ranks of ?. as _ _ _ ? (I can understand why you wouldn't want to change the implementation to conform to the Dictionary's spec of 0 0 0 ). -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
