On 9/11/07, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/11/07, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/11/07, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The point was the order in which things happen -- modifying f > > > changes the definition of g. > > > > oh yes, interesting point. That degree of dynamism will not be supported. > > In other words, you do not want named verbs? Why?
no, definitely named verbs, just lacking the ability to refer to something which is not already defined. a static language has named "verbs", it just doesnt have that degree of dynamic labelling that you showed. -- J IRC Channel irc://irc.freenode.org/jsoftware ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
