Apologies - I should have read the associated thread(s). I guess extended
precision does OK for whole number display, but croaks to a rational for
decimals...

On 12/5/07, Alex Rufon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Stuart,
>
> I need the same values that are not coverted to the notation.
>
> So if I do:
>   wdclipwrite 0.0000879 0.0000567 0.0000000924123412341
> 32
> I should get the following in Notepad:
> 0.0000879 0.0000567 0.0000000924123412341
>
> r/Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 10:56 PM
> To: General forum
> Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Engineering notation
>
> I get:
>
>
>   9!:10''
> 16
>   wdclipwrite 0.0000879 0.0000567 0.0000000924123412341
> 32
>
>
> (From Notepad after ctrl-V:)
>
> 8.79e_5 5.67e_5 9.24123412341e_8
>
> - is that not what you require?
>
>
> On 12/4/07, Alex Rufon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Devon,
> >
> > Yes, I fooled around with this too.
> >
> > You see, the problem is not in the number of digits but the precision.
> > Here is the current setting of my J Session:
> >   9!:10 ''
> > 16
> > Which shows I have 16 digits precision ... so if I used your example:
> >   0.123456789112
> > 0.123456789112
> > There is no problem ... but I am working with really small precision
> like:
> >   0.0000879
> > 8.79e_5
> > Unfortunately, if you use do this in conjunction with the clipboard
> >   wdclipwrite 0.0000879 0.0000567
> > 15
> > You'll get "erroneous" data.
> >
> > Of course I already have a work around for this but I was hoping that
> > there are simpler ways to print the proper number.
> >
> > Still, thanks. :)
> >
> > r/Alex
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Devon McCormick
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 8:59 PM
> > To: General forum
> > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Engineering notation
> >
> > I assume you know about the global print precision settings?
> >
> >   9!:10 '' NB. What is current precision?
> > 8
> >
> >   9!:11]12   NB. Set to 12 digits
> >   0.123456789112
> > 0.123456789112
> >
> > On 12/4/07, Alex Rufon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm vexed lately. J
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You see, I've been working on sample garments material purchasing
> for
> > > some time and this one is giving me a head ache. You see, I have to
> work
> > > with % allowances which sometimes translates to numbers which have
> more
> > > than 8 decimal position. Unfortunately, this is a sample garment or
> a
> > > prototype that the industrial engineers really want me to return the
> > > precise values. The problem is not in calculating them but in
> printing
> > > the values.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Take the following for example:
> > >
> > >    0.0000000924123412341
> > >
> > > 9.24123412341e_8
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Or while working with some keys ... I have the following problem:
> > >
> > > encodekey=: verb define
> > >
> > > 100000 100000 100000 base y
> > >
> > > )
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > decodekey=: verb define
> > >
> > > 100000 100000 100000 antibase y
> > >
> > > )
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >    encodekey 999999 12345 12345
> > >
> > > 9.99999123451234e15
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I do know that using the format function will print the text
> properly
> > > like so:
> > >    20j18 format 0.0000000924123412341
> > >
> > > 0.000000092412341234
> > >
> > >    20j0 format encodekey 999999 12345 12345
> > >
> > >     9999991234512344
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, this will entail that I have to work with boxes now
> since
> > > some of my values will be strings.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there a setting in J or a process that I am missing so that the
> > > correct values are printed? Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > r/Alex
> > >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Devon McCormick, CFA
> > ^me^ at acm.
> > org is my
> > preferred e-mail
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to