On Dec 21, 2007 1:26 PM, Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, this entire discussion is predicated upon having a better > definition for the 2-train (verb bident). If you don't like hook, don't > use it. But, unless you have a better use for its syntax, let me keep it.
Exactly. Put differently, I was trying to find if you had any objections to use of a hook conjunction, which I would agree with, in the context of allowing (f g) x to be equivalent to f g x I was not asking if you thought the hook conjunction would be be superior to the bident hook. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
