I would also like to have a native FreeBSD version of J.

My experience with trying to get J running on FreeBSD
has also been messy an unsatisfactory. Another problem is that you
have to use the linux version of Java rather than the native FreeBSD
version. In the end I reverted back to running J on windows (XP)
but on another machine.

With a native FreeBSD port and the new facility in "cd",
it should also be possible to experiment with Qt as an alternative
GUI to Java.

Steve

Eric Iverson wrote:
We are not in a position to improve the current support for freebsd at this time. Of course, we are always interested in doing custom consulting work and could do custom platform builds on that basis.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Yuri Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] native freebsd buid


my J based application uses custom C/C++ libs. to run it on freebsd I should compile my custom libs on linux (just because current J was compiled on linux) instead of compiling them to native freebsd libs... you'll have same situation for many math libs, for instance neural net (libfann), etc. the freebsd distr may have already compiled libfann, but I can't use it, I should compile it on linux, then copy to freebsd, then use it.... it is so ugly :(


why there is no native J build for freebsd? Is it hard for JSoftware to
support freebsd J dist?


I would be interested in hearing what problem would this solve,
given that freebsd can run linux binaries just fine.




--
Yuri Burger
Senior Software Architect
Labs Zoral, Kiev

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to