This is a very general claim, and it is easy to criticize anything from this point of view. No documentation is complete. On the other hand, having a good example is even more helpful.
To return to my question: what feature were you looking for beyond the JFE example? Do you have at least one question, that you hope such documentation would provide an answer for? > From: Zsbán Ambrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 20:10, Oleg Kobchenko wrote: > > J socket protocol was definitely not easier than the now published > > binary call-back interface, > > The problem is that it's not published. There's no proper > documentation, and the examples don't cover everything. I'd like a > real docs saying what I can do and what I can't, and what I can assume > the code would do and what it wouldn't. If this was documented, it > would be easy to use I guess. > > As the jevalbot proves, I _could_ figure out how the jep protocol > worked from the example, but I can't really figure out how this new > one works. > > Ambrus > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
