Difference in speed was kind of expected--maybe not to that degree.

Does it show that modern hardware does not provide enough to scale
for this kind of calculation?
Can anyone supply a comparison from other languages or libs: python, Haskel, 
Maple etc?

Interesting was almost the same space.
I thought it'd blow out the memory.


On Sep 27, 2008, at 14:48, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

52+52 is one hardware instruction and
52x+52x is implemented by software,
hence the 2 orders of magnitude difference 
in time.



----- Original Message -----
From: Oleg Kobchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008 10:04
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Limit error
To: General forum <[email protected]>

Interesting to compare 

   +/100000000#52    NB. about 1 sec
5.2e9

   +/100000000#52x   NB. about 1 min
5200000000

about the same memory. 

Let's verify precisely:

   10 ts '+/100000000#52'
0.834533 5.36872e8

   2 ts '+/100000000#52x'
54.2623 5.36873e8




From: Joey K Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I thought displaying it would be boring - but maybe not any 
more 
boring than $ or +/ ...

At 08:40  -0700 2008/09/27, Roger Hui wrote:
The difference is that Joey's expression did not
try to generate the display of 1e8#52 but Paul's
expression did, and it's in the generation of
that display that the limit error was signaled.



----- Original Message -----
From: Joey K Tuttle 
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008 8:22
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Limit error
To: General forum 

  Works OK on my Mac...

      $100000000 # 52
  100000000

      version ''
  Installer: j602a_mac_powerpc.dmg
  Engine: j602/2008-03-03/16:45
  Library: 6.02.023ProductName:    Mac 
OS X
  ProductVersion:    10.5.5


  At 15:52  +0100 2008/09/27, Paul Moore wrote:
  >In J32 on Windows, 100000000 # 52 gives a limit 
error. What
  does this
  >mean? I can't see anything stating that there is a 
limit in
  array size
  >(other than available memory) in the documentation.
  >
  >Is it possible for me to create a hundred-million 
entry array? (Such
  >an array of integers would be 400M in size, I have 
2G so memory
  should>not be an issue).


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm



      
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to