Not exactly, each core is busy alright with work but with less integral
power consumption (shorter connections).
The problem, however, is to divide a single piece of work into two equal
sized parts (in case of dual core) as Steven mentioned.

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>wrote:

> So they just sit around, taking it in turns to cool off?
>
> This is so unromantic it makes me weep. I paid good money for a new
> Mac with 2 duo-cores just for the blighters to sit around skiving.
>
> I recall way-back-when, IBM introduced water-cooled CPUs. If memory
> serves, there was a serious problem with algae getting in the cooling
> system. (There's got to be a joke there somewhere.)
>
> Ian
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jan Jacobs <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Henry, Dieter,
> > the reason why the rush to multiple core is the (power or) heat
> dissipation
> > in a single processor chip. When the transistor budget rises and the line
> > sizes shrink also distances are increasing relatively and a lot of
> useless
> > power (heat) is dissipated in the electrical connections. It was
> determined
> > that the power density (Watt/um^2) of such a chip even compares to the
> power
> > density of a nuclear power reactor! So the reason to go to multiple cores
> is
> > to avoid blowing up the chip. Since november 2004 (Intel then
> acknowledged
> > the end of high end single core processor models) manfacturers are
> putting
> > local RAM close to (multiple) local processors. When cores are similar
> this
> > is called multi-core (as quad core) and with heterogeneous systems this
> is
> > called many-core. The latter ones are really champions in reducing power
> > consumption.
> > Jan.
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:45 PM, DIETER ENSSLEN <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hallo Henry
> >>
> >> Image processing comes to mind for the need for power; and video
> >> processing, and there are always the gamers and hobbyists crying for
> more
> >> power, but with the latter it is power for the sake of power.
> >> Then there are the people who set records for the most digits for math
> >> constants and such.
> >>
> >> But no matter what we think, chip and computer manufacturers will keep
> >> upping the ante. Last decades supercomputer is today's PC.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jan Jacobs
> > Esdoornstraat 33
> > 5995AN Kessel
> > T: +31 77 462 1887
> > M: +31 6 23 82 55 21
> > E: [email protected]
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Jan Jacobs
Esdoornstraat 33
5995AN Kessel
T: +31 77 462 1887
M: +31 6 23 82 55 21
E: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to