David, what do you mean with "converted"? Is J64 not the same as J32 on J source level? I hoped to get rid of the "out of memory" messages because of the increased addresssing space without too much effort... Thanks in advance, Jan.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:32 PM, David Mitchell <[email protected]>wrote: > Jan, > > I am using J64-602 on Win7Pro_64 as my primary J at the moment. I still > have > some 32 bit code I have not converted, so I still use J32-602 for those > scripts. > > If you need the 64 bit address space, I can recommend J64-602. > > If you do not need the 64 bit address space, then J32-602 has worked fine > for me > on Win7Pro_64. > > If you are using J.EXE or J.DLL as servers, you will have to be careful > about > which ones you register, depending on the calling application. You can > only > have either the 32 bit or the 64 bit registered at a time, AFAIK. > > -- > All the best, > David Mitchell > > On 2/20/2010 8:42, bill lam wrote: > > Neither did I try W7-64, but David Mitchell reported it OK. > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/JfromExcel > > > > sab, 20 Feb 2010, Jan Jacobs skribis: > >> No, I do not have the system yet. Do you expect that the J64 XP64 > version > >> will run under W7? > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, bill lam<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> [---=| TOFU protection by t-prot: 10 lines snipped |=---] > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Jan Jacobs Esdoornstraat 33 5995AN Kessel T: +31 77 462 1887 M: +31 6 23 82 55 21 E: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
