On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:07:48 -0600 Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:57:25 -0500 (EST) > Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Collins Richey wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0500 > > > Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I suppose we could continue this thread along the lines of "Now > > > > that Gentoo has achieved respectability ...". > > > > > > > > > > Respectability, but probably never full LSB compliance, as one of > > > the detractors (strangely silent in recent weeks) would say. > > > > Just to stire the pot, and play devil's advocate, i will say that it > > hasn't achiveved respectability in alot of groups. There are some > > heated attacks on gentoo on the XFS mailign list, and i've seen some > > snide remarks on LKML as well. > > > > Just curious: do most of the snide remarks come from people who have > never tried it? I'm sure that the XFS folks would be miffed by the > fact that a few (but only a very few) gentoo developers have had > heartburn from XFS (lengthy thread on this list last year). I'm > curious what problem the LKML folks have with gentoo. > Just as a courtesy to all of us, I'm forking this off to general. I love a good interchange as well as the next, but some folks may prefer to stay on technical questions and solutions on linux-users. -- /\/\ ( CR ) Collins Richey \/\/ fly Independence Air - they run Linux _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsub/Pause/Etc -> http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
