on Friday, October 01, 2004 at 14:22 Alma J Wetzker wrote: [...]
" I am not sure where the sarcasm filter comes in. Right after the paranoia filter kicks off and just before the cynicism filter kicks on. There is a certain overlap. :-) " This is really just the same basic question that is asked of scientists and " technologists all the time, To what degree are we responsible for the uses " our gadgets are put? In my opinion, the significant questions here touch on when and where surveillance, whether on behalf of 'the state' or otherwise, becomes inappropriate. [...] " is a judgment call involved. We may not agree on where the line is, but we " agree there is a line. Thanks for pointing this out. You're welcome. Thanks for a thoughtful comment. R -- http://www.quen.net "Gold needs no endorsement, it can be tested with scales and acids. The recipient of gold does not have to trust the government stamp upon it, if he does not trust the government that stamped it. No act of faith is called for when gold is used in payments, and no compulsion is required." -Benjamin M. Anderson _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsub/Pause/Etc -> http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
