Am 02.01.2010 um 04:16 schrieb Daniel Moree <dmoree at shadowbranch.com>:
> The virtual hard drive is set to 10gb but is dynamically expanded.
> Basically, anyone could take the VirtualBox image and run it as a
> virtual server if they wanted. Not a big one but one none the less.
>
I don't think that the final image will be this big. After a gzip, the
file should be max 500MB, which is a reasonable size.
To store the file in the cloud, I would suggest an SF.net project.
What do you think?
R,
M
> Phillip Smith wrote:
>>
>> 2010/1/2 Daniel Moree <dmoree at shadowbranch.com>:
>>
>>> Yeah, working on a virtualbox package. Mostly just plugging up the
>>> repo info
>>> and such. I'll get it done tonight and packaged up. How do we
>>> wanna get it
>>> on the web? The one I'm using for testing is 8GB, maybe tone it
>>> down to 4GB
>>> for easy DVD storage though.
>>>
>>
>> Stueth... 8gb? How? The repo is only 557mb... The packages can't be
>> compressed that much?
>> _______________________________________________
>> ArchServer Project General Mail List
>> Post messages to: general at lists.archserver.org
>> Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ArchServer Project General Mail List
> Post messages to: general at lists.archserver.org
> Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.archserver.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20100102/a67e3eeb/attachment.html>
