----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: general at lists.archserver.org Date: 07.01.2010 15:12:41 Subject: Re: [ArchServer-General] [ ArchServer-General ] Repository Discussion No. III
> Good! I can't keep all these list e-mails. beginning to fill up my > mailbox! and I'm the server admin. > > Does anyone know of there is a way to view these via the web on AS site? There are a couple of possiblities to do something like an archive. E.g. www.mail-archive.com, markmail.com or even www.nabble.com. Something like this could also be implemented on the server itself via an own inbox on the server, which is then shown via an own web-interface (e.g. mod_mbox). See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-users/ for an example. But isn't mailman handling something like this as well? R, triplem > > Markus M. May wrote: > > I have moved this discussion into the forum, please find it here: > > > > http://bbs.archserver.org/viewtopic.php?pid=161#p161 > > > > I think there we can keep all the information together. > > > > R, > > > > triplem > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: mmay at javafreedom.org > > To: general at lists.archserver.org > > Date: 06.01.2010 21:52:11 > > Subject: [ArchServer-General] Repository Discussion No. III > > > > > >?? > >> Hello, > >> > >> in the forums there was a short discussion about the base, core and > >> server-core repositories. Furthermore I already asked about > >> java-applications. > >> Even though we have (right now) base, lamp and webapps, there seems to > >> me one missing. Think about Java and Ruby. The corresponding languages > >> are not really webapps (e.g. openjdk6, ruby) but they do not belong into > >> the lamp (like php) or even the base repo. > >> > >> I would like to discuss this once again and get further opinions and > >> positions on this. I do know that this is not a high priority, but I > >> still believe, that we should discuss this. > >> > >> My own position is, that we need, next to base (or server-base, > >> server-core) another repository like languages or extra. From my point > >> of view we should also think about a kind of community repo, even though > >> this should be done only in the long run and not right now. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> R, > >> > >> triplem > >> > >> -- > >> The penguin found me, and I do take care about him :-) > >> > >> mmay at javafreedom.org > >> http://javafreedom.org/blog > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ArchServer Project General Mail List > >> Post messages to: general at lists.archserver.org > >> Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general > >> > >>???? > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ArchServer Project General Mail List > > Post messages to: general at lists.archserver.org > > Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general > >?? >
