On 31.01.2010 22:51, Phillip Smith wrote: > On 31 January 2010 21:54, Markus M. May <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If we are going to just release this one Kernel, then there is no need for >> the LTS suffix. >> > I think the -lts suffix should be retained to help highlight that it > is different to the "normal" Arch Linux kernel, and won't be upgraded > in the rolling release model. > > It already "provides=('kernel26')" to deal with dependencies.... > +1 then from me. > _______________________________________________ > ArchServer Project General Mail List > Post messages to: [email protected] > Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general >
-- The penguin found me, and I do take care about him :-) [email protected] http://javafreedom.org/blog _______________________________________________ ArchServer Project General Mail List Post messages to: [email protected] Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
