On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:36:34 +0200 (CEST) "Markus M. May"<[email protected]> wrote: > > ARTS sounds fine for me as well, but the long version should then > contain ArchServer instead of Arch only ;-) > > I really like the idea of a security team, and I do believe that some > of our IRC participants will see this very positive as well > (rxMokka) ;-) So +1 for the whole idea. >
I suggested the ARTS name but someone else suggested 'Arch Security Team' and I was voted down. I don't have any problems with 'ArchServer Security Team' for now. I don't want to foster a culture whereby decisions are made from above and imposed on users. Participation and inclusiveness are a must in my opinion. I want to be open and honest about this. My ultimate goal is to see the team as an official Arch Security Team with our infrastructure moved over there if (hopefully) and when we become official. At the moment I see our goals as being compatible, but even if we become an official Arch Team, there's absolutely no reason why we couldn't continue to support the packages in ArchServer as well. It wouldn't be much extra work at all. If these terms are ok with you, then I'd like us to join archserver.org. If they're not then please send objections or corrections to the list! thanks, Ananda Samaddar
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ArchServer Project General Mail List Post messages to: [email protected] Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
