Or:
I think I find the SPEC part talking about zero-length message.
I just search zero-length.
For rdma write, the receiver side does not need to do anything,
for send, a receive
WR is need in receiver side. And that makes sense.
--CQ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Tang, Changqing
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:51 AM
> To: Or Gerlitz
> Cc: Roland Dreier; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ofa-general] What is the size of async event queue ?
>
>
> > Combining possibilities: if you want to get a notification on every
> > peer process crash, you would need to either poll/select
> once a while
> > the libibcm/librdmacm event queue or implement some keep a live of
> > your own protocol. For instance, I think the IB spec mentions doing
> > zero length rdma write once in a while as a mean for
> implementing such
> > protocol.
>
>
> Can you point me the spec page talking about zero-length
> rdma-write and send ?
>
> If I use zero-length rdma write, does it generate something
> on wire to let me detect broken connection, and there is no
> effect on remote buffer ?
>
> If I use zero-length send, do I get the same thing? How about
> if I don't have receive posted on remote side ?
>
> --CQ
>
>
> >
> > Or.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
