> Quoting Moni Shoua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Where does the claim that module unload is unsafe by definition > > come from? Weren't the races solved in 2.6 with the new in-kernel > > loader? > > Well, what happens with bonding and IPoIB speaks for itself, doesn't it?
Not to my eyes. > If I can unload a module that is being referenced from the outside This just means there's a bug in the specific module(s). In this case it is either ipoib or bonding module (or both). > then I am not protected by the kernel from doing something wrong. Yes, this is really fundamental in kernel programming. That's what makes it interesting. -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
