> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] OFED 1.2 Feb-26 meeting summary > > On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 20:42 -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > To be totally clear, there are three issues: > > > > 1. *NOT AN MPI ISSUE*: base location of the stack. Doug has > > repeatedly mentioned that /usr/local/ofed is not good. This is a > > group issue to decide. > > As long as the base OFED stack is /usr/local/ofed, if someone calls Red > Hat support to get IB help with RHEL5 or RHEL4U5, they will be told that > they must first delete all locally built OFED RPMs from the system. It > simply isn't realistic for us to try and support a system where > conflicting libraries can exist in different locations and attempts to > resolve the problem could end up being fruitless simply because the > wrong library is getting linked in behind our backs.
I think the prefix is easily configurable. So I think we should just say in the readme note that prefix should be /usr if one wants to get redhat support for infiniband. -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
