Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: Re: Re: Is ibv_get_async_event() a blocking call
?
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
upon a completion event, if a completion event for the same
CQ is outstanding, we can discard the new one as it does not
add new information.
I think you have replaced completion events with async events and event
channel (queue) with completion queue. There is no issue with CQ getting
bigger and bigger etc.
I'm sorry I could not parse this. We are worried about event channels
taking up to much memory. What I am pointing out is that we never need
to have two events for the same CQ in the same channel.
From your original post i could not understand this is what you want to
say.
Or.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
