On 21:18 Sat 24 Mar , Tzachi Dar wrote: > After some more checks, and given the limited time that I had for this, > I'm afraid that I wasn't able to find a way to do that. Do you have any > idea of how this can be done?
I think that using one of the ready pthread for windows implementations could be more optimal way. However if you still prefer a "wrapper" solution I found this article, this describes pthread_cond_wait() implementation issue, guess it is potentially hardest part of such wrapper. Hope it is useful. http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/win32-cv-1.html Sasha > > Thanks > Tzachi > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:42 PM > > To: Tzachi Dar > > Cc: Hal Rosenstock; [email protected]; Gilad Shainer; > > OPENIB; Fab Tillier > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [ofw] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: > > Re:winrelated[was:Re:[PATCH 1/2] opensm: sigusr1: syslog() fixes]]] > > > > Hi Tzahi, > > > > On 18:56 Wed 21 Feb , Tzachi Dar wrote: > > > > > > To be on the practical side, I have read the introduction > > to pthreads > > > in the past and from what I saw it was relatively easy to implement > > > that on Win32. I want to look at the functions that were mentioned > > > before in this thread and see if that is still the case. > > > > > > Let me get back to you on this at the beginning of next week. > > > > Any news here? Thanks. > > > > Sasha > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
