> Rather than IB_SMI_DISCARD, it seems to me that IB_SMI_LOCAL and > IB_SMI_SEND would be more in keeping with the current comments.
OK ... I guess the point is that exactly what those functions are returning is rather obscure at the moment. > Is a separate patch for this along these lines really needed before the > switch SMI changes ? Not necessarily, but I don't think changing a function to return 0, 1 or 2 is a good idea. So at least please fix that when adding switch SMI support. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
