> Good point. At a minimum, the spec is unclear about this (if they are > totally separate mechanisms).
When is the spec ever clear? :) But I think the only interpretation that has a chance at matching the current spec is to say that IsSMDisabled is not directly related to an SM in the NOT-ACTIVE state. Maybe it's worth asking the WG what the motivation for introducing IsSMDisabled was? - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
