On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 14:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > If yes, I'm actually not too happy with this. > > > > > > Would something like the following heuristic work better? > > > - select the max rate between all participants > > > > The issue is that one doesn't know all the participants in a group as > > they are joined dynamically. > > > > (I think we've been over this aspect on the list several times in the > > past.) > > That's why I suggest the fix, so that the rate is adapted > dynamically. > > > > - when a host with lower rate joins, destroy the group > > > > I don't think a group can be destroyed like this "underneath" its > > existing members. > > > > Of course it can. That's what happens when SM is restarted.
Client reregistration ? I don't like using that big hammer as a solution to this. Seems a little harsh to me. I'm not convinced it's even required either, -- Hal > > > and recreate it with lower rate, send every other participants > > > a reregister MAD > > How does it sound? _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
