> > This is a good addition. But I think it would be worth saying which > > half of the TID is the lower half. I would fix it up myself but I > > don't know off the top of my head which byte order the TID is > > interpreted with.
> Should this be described relative to network (rather than host) order ? Ideally it should be described so that it's clear to a user of this interface where the TID bits that belong to the user are. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
