> Quoting Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >2.Ah kept in the ipoib_neigh might belong to a device which is different > > from the one start_xmit is called at. > > Michael, Roland, > > Following the high-availability/bonding session at Sonoma, I'd like to > have a BOF to discuss the issues which from your perspective should be > addressed before the patch set is merged upstream. Will you be around?
I won't be able to make it unfortunately. > I just need a clarification on (2), can you educate me how can it > happen? Consider a specific neighbour. Can the following happen? If no, why not? - a packet is sent through ib0, ipoib_neigh and ->ah are created - bonding switches to ib1 for some reason - before ipoib_neigh and ah are flushed, a new skb arrives. It is posted on ib1 with ah which belongs to ib0 -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
