On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 16:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: RE: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] 2.6.22 or 23 ib: add path record cache > > > > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:32, Sean Hefty wrote: > > > >Isn't there a way to get notice for this? > > > > > > The closest trap I'm aware of is GID in/out of service. See 14.2.5.1 and > > > 14.4.9. GID in/out of service is related to the existence of a path > > > record > > > between the SGID and DGID. If the path record parameters change, I'm not > > > sure > > > if the GID technically goes out, then back into service or not. Maybe Hal > > > knows. > > > > No; there is no way to do this that I'm aware of. > > We can get notic on port state changes though, can't we?
Sure but those were intended for SM. The end node would then need to do DR SMP stuff (not just diagnostics) and there would be MKey assumptions as well as other things. DR SMPs are always slow pathed and there is no flow control on VL15. -- Hal > [snip...] _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
