> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: RE: [ofa-general] Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] 2.6.22 or 23 ib: add > pathrecord cache > > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 18:51, Sean Hefty wrote: > > >We could solve this by implementing a process running on the same node as > > >the > > >SA. > > >And it's probably not too hard to add a way for opensm to spit out > > >the table into an external file when it gets a signal or something. > > > > I agree that there are ways to solve this, but those solutions won't work > > with > > existing SAs and define a new SA interface. If we're willing to break > > compatibility or add extensions, we could also extend the SA to provide > > better > > support for caching. For example, add a new 'path updated' trap. > > There is ongoing work here. Stay tuned for IBA 1.2.1 hopefully coming > soon...
Maybe you guys want to discuss this in Sonoma. We wouldn't want to merge something non-standard upstream, creating compatibility problems for everyone. -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
