Oops... I see you asked that for mthca. Well, I might do it at a later time.
On 4/26/07, Eli Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/25/07, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Also is it worth taking the semaphore in the mthca reset function? > > > > Why not? PRM says we should - the point of this is protecting against > someone > > accidentally touching flash while device is reset, > > which will result is hangs, system errors or even data corruption. > > OK... that was just my subtle way of asking for a patch to do that. I don't follow you: the code that uses the semaphore is already in the patch I sent. Apart from the the change in the vendor id field, I think it can be applied as is. _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
