However, I think that is the "better" problem - SDP is a "protocol" not
an address family. (Again, based on what little I understand about
SDP).
I see why this makes sens for you, but in what sense is it a "better" problem?
Because it isn't trying to describe a change in protocol as a change in
addressing. It makes getting to SDP look like getting to any other
transport-layer protocol - eg UDP, TCP, or SCTP. My intuitive guessing
suggests that fewer folks use getprotobyname() than getaddrinfo().
rick jones
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
