On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 06:57 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: [PATCH] infiniband: add support for invalidate stag
> >
> > Patch to add support for the iWARP verbs SEND with INV and SEND with SE
> > and INV.
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.21.1/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h 2007-04-28
> > 15:35:02.677618096 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.21.1/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h 2007-04-28
> > 15:29:16.200290656 -0400
> > @@ -611,7 +611,8 @@ enum ib_send_flags {
> > IB_SEND_FENCE = 1,
> > IB_SEND_SIGNALED = (1<<1),
> > IB_SEND_SOLICITED = (1<<2),
> > - IB_SEND_INLINE = (1<<3)
> > + IB_SEND_INLINE = (1<<3),
> > + IB_SEND_INVALIDATE = (1<<4)
> > };
> >
> > struct ib_sge {
> > @@ -646,6 +647,9 @@ struct ib_send_wr {
> > u16 pkey_index; /* valid for GSI only */
> > u8 port_num; /* valid for DR SMPs on switch only */
> > } ud;
> > + struct {
> > + u32 rkey;
> > + } invalidate;
> > } wr;
> > };
>
> Shouldn't this rather be part of rc wr?
What's an rc wr?
He added the invalidate struct to the union part of the ib_send_wr. Its
analogous to the rdma struct in that union in that its additional values
passed in the send wr for an iwarp send w/invalidate and send-se
w/invalidate. The seems reasonable to me...
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
