> > > +static int ipoib_cm_post_receive(struct net_device *dev, u64 id)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (priv->cm.srq)
> > > + ret = post_receive_srq(dev, id);
> > > + else
> > > + ret = post_receive_nosrq(dev, id);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> >
> > I think you can split this one now that srq/nonsrq completions are
> > handled separately.
>
> I don't understand this commennt.
Since you now have 2 handle_wc routines for srq/nonsrq,
call the appropriate one directly. Generally, I think we can
get rid of if (srq) tests on data path.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
