On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 01:22, Keshetti Mahesh wrote: > > [please try to keep your line lengths below 80 columns] > > sure.. > > >I think a patch moving structures defined by the IB spec to a more > >appropriate location would be fine. > > Isn't the include/rdma/ib_smi.h is an appropriate location?
Not really as this is for SMI which is lower in the architecture than SM class attributes. Maybe ib_mad.h or some new header files (ib_sma.h and ib_pma.h) are more appropriate. What do others think ? -- Hal > >Think about it... what could endianess mean for a single-byte field? > > Yes.. got the point. > > -Mahesh > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Heres a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
