Hi again Ganesh, On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:42, Ganesh Sadasivan wrote: > Hi Hal, > > Please see inline. > > On 16 May 2007 19:22:00 -0400, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > Hi Ganesh, > > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 19:00, Ganesh Sadasivan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a setup with 2 HCAs connected back to back and am > running > > opensm (ofed1.1, running at the same priority) on both of > them. Is > > there any utility to see who is the master? > > Even with priority difeferences I am seeing the same behavior.Am I > missing any option. I am setting "opensm -s 30" and "opensm -s 60" on > the respective sides.
Why not use the default (10 secs) or at least the same on both sides ? > sminfo will show the SM state for a LID/GUID. > > > Thanks. > > > The smlid in ibv_devinfo, seems to be changing whenever an > SM does a > > sweep. Is this expected? > > Nope. If they are both at the same priority, the lower GUID > should win > the SM election. > > Not sure what is going wrong in your (back to back HCA) > subnet. Do you > ports stay active ? > > > Yes both ports are active. And they stay active (no LED color changes) ? If not, can you run both OpenSMs in verbose mode (-V) and see if there is anything interesting/relevant in the logs ? -- Hal > Thanks > Ganesh > > -- Hal > > > Thanks > > Ganesh > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > To unsubscribe, please visit > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
