> Quoting Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: IPoIB NETIF_F_SG flag for GSO > > Hello Roland, Michael, > > I tried GSO for IPoIB last year, I didn't see much BW for UD rather than some > cpu utilization decreasement. I looked the GSO patch carefully then I found > there are additional skb copies in skb segment. If the device supports SG, > then > the copies can be avoided. IPoIB does support SG, I am planning to enable it > to > test GSO again. I would like to know whether you have tried this before? Any > possible issue you can think of? > > Thanks > Shirley Ma
Yes. SG currently needs csum offloading, and IPoIB does not support that. -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
