hi roland, ... On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:13:44PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > I didn't apply this either because it depends on 26/28 and I held off > on that one. I think checking for interrupts in a low-level driver > *is* sane though...
yeah, me too, if you _really_ don't want the ipath LID check, i can respin this one to combine them and lv out the LID check. but then the LID check is only gonna be a few lines, it'll seem even sillier to lv it out... arthur _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
